A.D.A- The following report has not been peer reviewed and therefore has no scientific merit.
At the end of the report ADA reviews
the misleading statistics
TAIL INJURIES OF SHORTHAIRED GERMAN
POINTER DOGS BORN IN SWEDEN 1989
The Breed Council
- German Short-haired Pointer
The
Agricultural Advisor,
Graduate
of Agricultural College
Gunilla
Strejffert
Nybybagen
14
781
96 Borlange
23
February 1992
INTRODUCTION
The German Short-haired Pointer is a
pointing gundog of continental type
with Germany as its country of origin. In the background of
these dogs there is
Spanish, German and English blood.The German Short-haired Pointer in its
present form received its written standard description atthe end of the 19th
century. In body construction, the German Short-haired Pointer is somewhat
heavier and moresubstantial than English pointing gundogs such as Pointers and
Setters.
The German Pointer isvery happy and very lively, both in body and in
soul. It usually moves
in a very fresh, even abrupt way, especially in hunting situations.
The GSP was mainly used as a pointing gundog. It was also used as a
retriever
both on land andsea, as a tracking/search dog, as a flushing dog etc. It has become
popular as a sled dog. Many of those who have chosen to acquire a German Pointer,
have done so
because of the dog’s versatility, especially as a hunting dog. Another
very strong reason is
that the German Pointer isvery hardy and robust.Up until 31 December 1988, the German Pointer could have a docked tail,
whereupon one half to two thirds of the tail was saved. From 1 January 1989 the
docking of
dogs tails in Sweden was banned. It had already become apparent during
1989 that the
long-tailed German Pointershad acquired a good few injuries on their
long tails. In some
individuals, it was even necessaryto amputate the tail before one
year of age, as a result of extensive
tail injuries which did not heal easily. The incidence
of tail injuries seemed to increase in 1990.
The Swedish German Pointer Club therefore
decided to investigate how common and how serious
a problem were tail injuries in
the long-tailed German Pointers. An interview
investigation was carried out during
the late autumn of 1990. This tail investigation was followed up
by a questionnaire
investigation during the late
autumn of 1991.
INVESTIGATION METHODS
During the late autumn of 1990 an interview investigation was carried
out
amongst the 53 litters of German Pointers which were registered during 1989.
50 of these
litters were long-tailed. The other three litters were born during
1988 and were docked. Information
about the long-tailed litters and their
breeders were collected from the Swedish Kennel Club’s
annual register of registered German Shorthaired Pointers for 1989. In the first part of
the
investigation, we asked the breeders;
How many dogs in the litter received tail injuries,
The type and seriousness of the possible tail injury,
Possible tail amputations,
"Degree of strain in terrain" that the dogs
had been put through.
This investigation was followed up by a complementary interview
investigation in the litters with tail injuries. The severity of the tail injuries
was set against
the relevant German Pointers’ body constitution and
temperament.
During the autumn of 1991 a further investigation was carried out
(a
questionnaire investigation) regarding tail injuries of those German
Pointers born
during 1989. The breeders then received the new
questionnaire as well as their old statements
about tails made in 1990 to
be able to follow up the changes. Replies were received from 26
breeders. To make it all more accurate, we picked out these 26 litters
from the 1990 investigation and
collated the materialseparately. We
were then able to compare the changes within one and same
group
during the years of 1990 and 1991.
ORIGIN OF TAIL INJURIES
The tail injuries occur mainly
during hunting. The injuries are
then maintained during further hunting and also in the home. During
1991 approximately 15 dogs had
injured their tails at home.
Some of the sledding dogs received tail injuries whilst being
trained.
FREQUENCY OF TAIL INJURIES
During the autumn of 1990, when the dogs were between 12
and eighteen
months old, we received replies to our interview
investigation regarding 44 litters.
The investigation included 299 individual dogs (142 dogs and 157
bitches). It then became
apparent that tail injuries had occurred in 23 of these litters. 81
individual dogs had suffered from
tail injuries. This compared
to approximately 27% of the whole investigated group. Dogs were
somewhat
more affected than bitches. In the autumn of 1991, the
same dogs were now 24 to 30 months old. This
time we received replies from 26 litters. To make it more accurate, we picked out
these
26 litters from the 1990 investigation, and collated the
material separately. We were then able
to compare the changes
within the same group between 1990 and 1991. In 1990, the
group of 26 litters consisted of 191 individuals. In 1991,
179 of
these were still alive. (What
happened to the other 12?) Of the
26 litters, 16 had received tail
injuries in 1990and 23 litters in
1991. In 1990, we found 72 individuals with tail
injuries,
corresponding to 38% of the group. In 1991 the number of tail
injured individuals had
increased to 92, corresponding to 51%
ofthe group. The number
of tail injured dogs had increased by
more than 30%. It could now be established that the male dogs had received
somewhat
more injuries. If onewere to transfer the above increase
of 30% of tail injuries into the
larger investigation group,the 44
litters from the 1990 investigation, we would end up with an
increase in frequency of tail injuries from 27% in 1990 to 35%
in 1991. This large group can be seen
to be representative of
the population of German Short-haired Pointers bornduring
1989. In other words, every third German Pointer with a long
tail has suffered from more or less serious
tail injuries.
OCCURRING TYPES OF TAIL INJURY
The kind of tail injuries which occurred during 1990 and
1991
respectively were on the whole the same, for example: bleeding
and damaged tail tips, (the last 10cms of the
tail) with light,
medium and severe injuries (on occasion it has been very
difficult for
the injuries to heal), infected and inflamed tails, lameness injuries and so called water tails and broken tails.
SEVERITY OF TAIL INJURY
The tail injuries were graded as light, medium or severe,
for each
individual dog in 1990 and 1991. It was established
how the tail injuries had changed between the
two years: 15 had
improved 37 were unchanged 47 were worse
The degree of severity appears to be linked to:
the liveliness of the dog and the tail,
how much and how intensive the dog is used/hunted andthe type of terrain where the dog is used/hunted
When the bushiness (presumably of
the terrain not the tail!)
is increased, especially in woodand mountainous terrain, the number
of tail injuries increase and the severity of the tail injuries increase
AMPUTATION (known
cases)
In certain cases, the tail injuries of the German Short-haired
Pointers
born in 1989 were so extensive and difficult to heal that
the only solution was to amputate
the tail. In total, thus far, 7 dogs
of the investigated group (10%) have had their tails amputated. In
1989
three dog tails (2 dogs and 1 bitch) were amputated. The dogs were
only
6, 6 and 11 months old. In the later investigation it became
apparent that a further four
dogs (3 dogs and 1 bitch) had hadtheir
tails amputated.
The age of amputation was 21 months, 2, 3 and 3 years
respectively.
CONCLUSION
The German Short-haired Pointer is a pointing gundog of continental type. It is a heavy set dog
with a lively temperament and very strong and
fast movements in the
terrain.
The German Short-haired Pointer could be docked up until
31 December
1988. From the 1 January 1989, the docking of dogs
tails was banned in Sweden. It became apparent that the German
Pointers with long tails born during
1989, received a fair amount
of injuries on their long tails already in 1989. It can be noted
that
the dogs had not reached even one year of age. The tail injuries
continued to occur
during 1990 and 1991. The frequency and severity
of the tail injuries increased.
The Swedish German Pointers Clubs breeding council carried out
investigations (interviews and questionnaires) during the late autumn
of 1990 and 1991
respectively, regarding the incidence of tail injuries
on long-tailed German Pointers born in 1989.
In the autumn of 1990 when the dogs were 1 - 1.5 years old,
27% of the
dogs had suffered from
tail injuries. The investigated
group consisted of 44 litters, 299
individual dogs. In the autumn of 1991 when the dogs were 2 - 2.5 years old,
35% of the
dogs had suffered from
tail injuries. In other words, every
third German Pointer with a long
tail had suffered from tail injuries.
Types of tail injuries:
bleeding and damaged tail tips, with sometimes
difficult healing,
infected and inflamed tails,
lameness injuries and so called water tails and broken tails.
The severity of the tail injuries: the tail injuries have in total
increased in severity up until 1991. Up to now, 7 cases of tail
amputated dogs in the "more
adult" investigated age group areknown. The severity of the tail injuries seem to depend on the
liveliness of the dogs and the tails, how much the dogs are
worked and what type of terrain they are
worked in. The more lively the dog and the more abrupt the
movement (breed characteristic), (male dogs somewhat
more inclined to injury),the more the dog is used (the
German Pointer is a
hunting dog) and the bushier and
thicker the terrain in which the dog
works (mainly woodland in mountainous terrain):then the more serious the injuries of the
dog’s tail
and the bigger the risk of amputation. The situation
whereby every third German Pointer dog with a long tail is
suffering from injuries and an increase of the frequency and
severity of those injuries is
unacceptable.
The above investigation relates to German Short-haired
Pointers. A
similar investigation hasbeen conducted for
German Wire-haired Pointers. It shows similar
results. A
return to docking of these two German Pointer breeds at
the age of three days is necessary.
Borlange, 23 February 1992
(signed)
Gunilla Strejffert
A.D.A.
review on the above:-
SWEDISH GERMAN SHORT-HAIRED
POINTER REPORT
The survey seems to apply to “working” dogs
and not pets.
Working dogs may have
been worked in non-welfare friendly
conditions
Page 2 (highlighted paras) from which the above figure wascited.
There was a 26 litter cohort group who
answered the questionnaire
both in 1990 and 1991 (191 dogs).
(In 1991 TWELVE of these young
dogs were DEAD!(6.3%))
leaving a total of 179 dogs in cohort group
In 1990 72 dogs had tail injuries(38%) =51%
In 199120 dogs had tail injuries(13%)
i.e. There was a cumulative increase
over 2 years (51%) BUT THE RATE OF INJURY HAD
DROPPED BY TWO THIRDS in
the second year
A total of 7 dogs had tails amputated in the report;
less than the amount of dead
dogs.
It might also compare similarly to those
breeds with undocked
tails used for field work such as English Pointers,
Retrievers,
Labradors, Setters etc.