<a href="http://www.top100dogsites.com/in.php?site=579">
<img src="http://www.top100dogsites.com/button.php?site=579" border="0"></a>

11/11/2007

The Anti-Docking Alliance 

ADA2

 

 

The Campaign Against the Docking of Dogs' Tails

Latest News and Updates

ExactSeek - Relevant Search                                                                      

Search the Web


The content on this website has been painstakingly collated over a period of time and those wishing to have the
benefit and use of information must seek permission to do so and if permission is granted for
its use,
it must be attributed to the Anti-Docking Alliance.

Q: WHERE DOES A DOG GO WHEN HE LOSES HIS TAIL? - A: To a re-tailo/er !  (OR DEFRA!)
E-MAIL ADDRESSES
Quite a few members have changed their email address since joining, please make sure you  keep me informed as to any changes to your email/snail mail addresses

MEMBERSHIP  If you  are joining ADA please ensure you give a correct  email address to which a reply can be sent.  If you don’t,  it is regretted that it will not be possible to process your membership.   Just to warn you  that emails with SUBJECT  “hi”  "photos" or left blank do not get opened as the majority are spam/viruses and are deleted.  Membership can now only be dealt with by email.

ADA is a non-funded Organisation and therefore we have to keep expenses to the minimum.  This seems a preferable way to operate rather than registering as a Charity and attracting funds which might make other Charities lose out.     We do have a  selected Committee for the various dog groups and activities and a grand bevy of volunteers who always seem to help out when the call comes.  Anything we have achieved to date is by way of the help we receive from A.D.A. members, several of our Committee of Honour and other professionals who also have so kindly donated their time and expertise for which we are extremely grateful.  
 
A.D.A. has associate members in 32 countries and an ever increasing membership in the USA with more and more breeders registering.

    puppybarks  

A.D.A. needs you to act on any puppy advertisement you see which advertises docked puppies.  Please read below
first and also send a copy to A.D.A. of  any complaint you make to a Local Authority so we can assess the number of
instances where the law appears to be being flouted.
If anyone can give me the contact point of their Local Authority I would be grateful as am endeavouring to build up
index at this link
Local Authorities

Regulations for tail docking were debated in both England and Wales as a part of the Animal Welfare Act 2006, and
these Regulations came into force on 28th March in Wales and 6th April in England.  Under the Regulations,
in England and Wales:

  • The cosmetic docking of dogs is banned .  Therapeutic docking (treatment of illness/injury etc.) is permitted on all dogs
  • There is an exemption for 'working dogs' as defined by the English and Welsh regulations to include those used by the police,
    armed forces, search and rescue, and gun dogs and dogs used for pest control purposes
    . The breeds covered by this
    exemption can be found below for England and Wales.
  • Only a vet can dock an exempted puppy's tail, he must see the dam of the puppy and he must carry out the procedure before the
    puppy is five days old (although the vet's decision to dock is entirely discretionary).
  • If the vet decides to dock the puppy he must certify that he has seen specific written evidence that the dog is "genuinely likely to
    work" in one of the permitted areas and the puppy has to be microchipped.
  • The owner must also make a declaration that the dog is likely to work (a false declaration is an offence).
  • Dogs born after April 2007 cannot be shown with docked tails at fee paying shows in England and
    Wales but can be in Scotland if they have been docked legally.
  • The owner of the dog should have in their possession the legal docking certificate.

    Anyone seeing an advertisement which does not meet the above criteria should immediately report it with as much evidence
    as possible to the Local Authority in which the breeder lives (search the web for Local Authorities and then
    go to Animal welfare on these sites. They can also be reported to the RSPCA 
    RSPCA cruelty and advice line tel. 0870 55 55 999. or use this link
    http://www.rspca.org.uk/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RSPCA/RSPCARedirect&pg=MyRSPCA

    This link can help trace telephone numbers in adverts:-
    http://www.ukphoneinfo.com/cgi-bin-Phones/nng?GNG=01299266532&Submit=Submit

    The Local Authority, the RSPCA and any private individual can bring a case to Court.  If a case is proven expenses can be
    re-claimed.

    REGULATIONS:-
    ENGLAND
    -  The  regulations for truly WORKING dog exemptions as from 6th April 2007
    (although some may be found not to be suitable for work later) are
        TERRIERS and their crossbreeds

        SPANIELS and their crossbreeds 
        H(unt)P(oint)R(etriever)s

    This does not apply to dogs bred as pets
    .
    There seems to be a consensus that these regulations must be reviewed between 2 and 5 years.
    also see these relevant DEFRA links:-
    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/20071120.htm
    http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfare/act/index.htm
    http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfare/act/docking.htm

WALES -   The list of truly working dog breeds exempted and as amended in the Welsh Plenary as from 28th March 2007
(although some may be found not to be suitable for work later) is now as follows:
     SPANIELS: of only the following breeds will be eligible  English Springer Spaniel;  Welsh Springer Spaniel;  Cocker Spaniel,
           but not combinations of breeds and 
    TERRIERS of only the following breeds will be eligible Jack Russell Terrier, Cairn Terrier  (normally undocked!)
           Lakeland  Terrier, Norfolk Terrier
- but not combinations of breeds.
 
  H(unt)P(oint)R(etrieve) breeds remain as originally drafted. Bracco Italiano; Brittany; German Long-haired  Pointer;           German
                 Wire-haired Pointer; Hungarian Vizsla; Hungarian Wire-Haried Vizsla; Italian Spinone; Spanish Water Dog;
                 Weimaraner; Korthals Griffon; Slovakian Rough-Haired Pointer; Large Munsterlander; Small Munsterlander.
This does not apply to dogs bred as pets.
Also see this link:
-
http://new.wales.gov.uk/topics/environmentcountryside/ahw/animal_welfare/Companiondomesticanimalwelfare/taildockingregulations
/?lang=en

Anyone who is cruel to an animal, or does not provide for its welfare needs, may be banned from owning animals,
fined up to £20,000 and/or sent to prison.

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/draft/20075778.htm

SCOTLAND - The Animal Welfare Act bans certain "mutilations" which includes dog tail docking except
for therapeutic reasons as from 30th April, 2007. 
Scottish Executive:- 'If dogs are to be taken from Scotland for the purpose of having the tails of their
puppies docked, to be then brought back to Scotland for sale, it is likely that the courts would consider
this to be a journey in connection with an economic activity. As a consequence the provision of Council
Regulation (EC) no 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport would apply. The significance
of this Regulation is that the animals must be "fit to travel" and Chapter 1 of Annex 1 of the Regulation
states that pregnant female for whom 90% or more of the expected gestation period has already passed and
females who have given birth in the previous week are not considered fit for transport. Thus if a dog were to
be taken from Scotland to give birth, she would need to make the journey at least 6 days before the expected
date of the birth and could not be transported back for 7 days following the birth.'END

A review of the legislation may be done later.  We approve of this legislation.    Scotland has not banned the showing
of docked dogs.  
The penalty for docking a dog's tail will be a fine of up to£5,000 and/or six months imprisonment. see this link for
the complete Act:-
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/acts2006/20060011.htm

N. IRELAND - Still ongoing consultation as at June 2007 but law currently remains as it was pre 2006.

 

adaANIMAL WELFARE ACT - ENGLAND 6th April 2007 - & WALES  27th March 2007
COMES INTO FORCE..    NO MORE DOCKING (EXCEPT FOR THE EXEMPTIONS). 
  A BIG THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO WENT OUT OF THEIR WAY TO HELP WITH THIS.  

KENNEL CLUB ADVICE ON DOCKING AS FROM 14/3/07 - http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk:80/item/999
11/07 The Kennel Clubs have said that they will not take part in 'e nforcing the legislation which bans dogs from certain shows considering
that this is a matter for the appropriate authorities .  As a result of the regulation change, owners of legally docked dogs, docked on or after
6th April 2007 who wish to exhibit at Kennel Club licensed shows are required to apply for permission to show their dogs.  It should be noted
that such dogs are only eligible to be exhibited in England and Wales at shows which do not charge the public for admission but may be
exhibited at all licensed shows in Scotland and Northern Ireland
. '

3/3/07 - DOCKING OF EXEMPTED DOGS  - Vets will not be forced to dock dogs' that are on the exemption lists on request of the breeders . The choice will be theirs. 
What has to be decided is that, if they do dock, at what length?  Above or below the supra-caudal scent glands, an arbitrary or by protocol length?

16/2/07  DOCKING REGULATION exemptions FOR ENGLAND (draft) http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/draft/20075778.htm

Wales's ban comes into force 31st March 2007; England's docking ban comes into force on 6th April; Scotland on 30th April 2007.  

The English Regulations we were led to believe were to go through a "Consultation" process. What a waste of everyone's time!  Where, when and how?!
This is certainly not evident as the draft regulations appear to be unchanged from their original format.  
The regulations are weak and
practically unenforceable being mainly left to Local Authorities who will have no extra funding.  Private prosecutions can be made at the expense
of the individual (refundable we are told if case is won!)  Ethical Vets will have the uneviable task of having to deal with clients trying to bluff them
into docking a litter(s).  
From recent discussion it is obvious that there are breeders in Gundogs who will go to any lengths to get litters docked.

No good reasons have been given for still incorporating crossbreeds to the already large list of exemptions and  no central register is to be kept in
order for a paper trail audit.  No DNA testing to be done and there will be weeks apart from the docking procedure and microchipping.  Evidence as to
the dog's likelihood to work can be presented to a Vet from just about anybody. Dogs that weren't docked can now be docked.    This part of the Act is
a total  whitewash and failure to deal with animal welfare which the government likes to proudly boast it does.  We hope that the Statutory Instruments'
Committee will see just how wrong and difficult these regulations will be to enforce and will send them back for unbiased revisions.  How can we be
sure that those involved with these regulations did not have a vested interest themselves? 
Scotland much to its credit, has got it RIGHT with a total ban with scientific review.   WELL DONE SCOTLAND.

14/2/07 defraWESTMINSTER BRIEFING ON THE ANIMAL WELFARE ACT.  Held at The Commonwealth Club, London.  GSP and
Vizsla breeders and GSP rescue were present as were all other parties including A.D.A. involved in the Act.  Chaired by Cllr Geoffrey Theobald LACORS.,
Presentations were by Chloe Nash Barrister DEFRA, Graham Thurlow, Veterinary Adviser DEFRA, Richard Brunstrom N Wales Police, ACPO.,
Claire Robinson Government Relations Manager, RSPCA,
1/07 SCOTLAND  is having a FULL TAIL DOCKING BAN with no exemptions as from 30th April 2007.  It will not be permissible for
dogs to be taken across borders to be docked.
  The penalty for docking will be £5,000 fine and/or 6 months' imprisonment
http://www.scottishexecutive.gov.uk/News/Releases/2007/02/07102500
The regulations will be approved by Committee in time for the Act to come into force in April 2007.
IRELAND - have already had their consultation and it closed on 6th December, 2007.  ADA was not given information as a stakeholder but in order
for legislation to be complied with ADA was permitted to send in a late submission.
22/12/06 RCVS disciplinary case regarding docking by a Cheltenham Veterinary Surgeon. 15/12/06 - Vet John McKenna has been accused of docking 11 Weimaraner
puppies.  He was due to face the RCVS hearing Committee on 12/12/06
Geoff Gill (RCVS) commented It isn't acceptable to hack a chunk of an animal's body off.  If the Vet can prove the animals were intended for working purposes it may
be permitted.  The exception exists to prevent working dogs from damaging their tails when going through bushes and undergrowth
The Vet said that he was told that these dogs MIGHT grow up to become working dogs so I docked their tails.  It isn't illegal to dock the tails of working dogs.  ....It's
something I may only carry out once a year. If someone rang me and asked me to dock the tail of a greyhound I'd say no." 22/12/06  He was found guilty and was
removed from register for 28 days.

In 1995 Marshall Dale was first and last Vet for 11 years to be charged by the RCVS and was acquitted..  Defence costs in excess of £25,000 were met by the
CDB (hunting
lady who supports them in a big way financially I seem to remember being told!)

At last the RCVS has acted but the case (RCVS complaints procedure) had to be brought by the breeder herself who apparently claimed that a puppy
died as a result and others got infected stumps.

Since this is the first docking disciplinary action case since 1995 when Marshall Dale was found not guilty on the evidence provided (defence costs
provided by CDB funds in excess of £25,000)  perhaps now they will investigate some of the other Vets who are making a good income from CDB docking
referrals.  However until the RCVS change the complaints procedure which only permits the aggrieved client to lodge a complaint
they are unlikely
to be seen proceeding against those Vets on the CDB list.

We are hopeful they will consider changing this when the Veterinary Surgeons' Act comes under review.

8/11/06 WESTMINSTER - Animal Welfare Bill received Royal Assent.  We now have the Animal Welfare Act 2006, which will come into force in
England on 6 th April 2007.   Regulations still have to be agreed on various sections of the Act including docking exempted working dogs.
6/11/06 WESTMINSTER  - Commons - Proceedings on Consideration of Lords' Amendments  - Lords Amendments Nos. 1 to 70 agreed 
31/10/06 WESTMINSTER - Lords' Marshalled List of Amendments for 3rd reading - Clause 6 is the appropriate clause
.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/240/06240.1-5.html
1/11/06 WESTMINSTER - Lords' approved amendments for the AWB to move to the Commons
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/240/06240.1-5.html

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldhansrd/pdvn/lds06/index/061101.html#contents

6/10/06 SCOTLAND  The Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act comes into force April 2007 - docking banned unless exemptions are
made under regulations

9/06 SCOTTISH KENNEL CLUB - Is attempting to overturn the docking ban in Scotland by petition.  They aim to get 10,000 signatures in the hope that this will be
sufficient 'for Parliament to take notice '  The SKC say that the working dog exemption was lost because evidence proving the type of injuries caused to the tails of
undocked working dogs has been hard to produce'.
7/06 SCOTLAND - Animal Welfare Bill has had Royal assent.  The Bill has the intention of introducing a total ban on tail docking with no exceptions for
"working" dogs.   However there will be further consultations in October to allow representations from those bodies who feel that they can prove a need for
exemption through scientific evidence.
It will not be lawful for breeders to cross the border to get their dogs docked.
31/5/06 TODAY'S VICTORY.  SCOTLAND THE BRAVE! Have voted for a total tail docking ban today (subject to regulation).   Many
realised the difficulties in legislation for exemptions without loopholes.  They have also included an amendment which does not permit breeders to take dogs
over the border to get them docked.
4/5/06 - Government Departmental shuffle - David Miliband has taken over DEFRA from Margaret Beckett.  He didn't vote
at all on docking in the Commons' vote on 14/3/06
.......... 
Eric Morley has also left.

ALL ABOUT DOGS, BRENTWOOD, ESSEX, SATURDAY AND SUNDAY 13TH AND 14TH MAY 2006. 
My apologies if I didn't find you afterwards to say thank you to all of you who so kindly stayed around to help out.  We had a wonderful collection of dogs in
Arena 2 on both days and all were so very well behaved.  You did us proud and so many many thanks for giving up your time.
allaboutdogs
WAG & BONE SHOW, Windsor Great Park, Windsor, Berkshire. Saturday 5th August, 2006  - ADA had a stand with dogs on view and we had one
whole heat in the Waggiest Tail of undocked dogs.   Breeds represented were Rottweilers, Soft-coated Wheaten and Norfolk Terriers, Weimaraners, Springer
and Cocker Spaniels, Miniature Schnauzers, Miniature and Standard Poodles, Boxers, Old English Sheepdog.  Many thanks to all our members who attended
and whose dogs all behaved so well despite the heat of the day.
15/3/06   Commons Report Stage http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/117/06117rsp.htm
14/3/06 Report and 3rd Reading - Total ban failed by 6 votes.  Exemptions for working dogs passed. 
Certain breeds/crossbreeds/?mongrels of dogs, if they can be proved that they will be used as working dogs under regulations,
will be permitted to be docked. 
Dogs will not be able to be shown docked. The Bill will probably be voted on in the Lords in
about a month.  Most of the detail will be in regulation which will be dealt with in consultation with Stakeholders after the Bill
has received Royal Assent in November 2006.
This is how YOUR MP rewarded you after all your hard work (check it out):-
The first division below was voting for the clause
(dog tail docking in the Bill AYES 476  NOES 63  on the following link:-
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm060314/debtext/60314-24.htm#60314-24_div187
The second division was for total ban (AYES) or exemptions (NOES).  NOES got it by 11 votes.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm060314/debtext/60314-25.htm#60314-25_div188
14/3/06
3/3/06 Important RCVS Statement issued today see this link:- http://www.rcvs.org.uk/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=94508

19/1/06 RADIO SHROPSHIRE - You might like to know that in a brief telephone poll on Radio Shropshire this a.m. the votes were 78% against docking
and 21% for.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmstand/a/st060117/pm/60117s08.htm
Mr. Bradshaw: I shall certainly consider that idea, although I cannot give the Hon. Gentleman any assurance about a statutory instrument.
The Government will not be able to control what amendments are debated on Report: that will be up to Mr. Speaker. However, both sides
have made it clear that if the issue is raised, it is not one on which the Government would be right to whip Labour Members. For the reasons
that I have given, it is our strong preference that the issue should be dealt with by statutory instrument. Going by the balance of opinion
in the Committee
, we would bring forward a statutory instrument based on the invisible version 3, which would implement a full ban on
the tail docking of dogs.
1998>    PAIN - Recent research has shown that neonates are HYPERsensitive rather than HYPOsensitive as has been widely believed.  Neonates have an intact sensory
central nervous system that does not have descending modular pathways that act as pain blocks seen in adults.  Research has also shown that the memory of neonatal pain
can affect the animal in its adult life.  Symptoms include decreased pain threshold, anxiety, social disorders and aggression.    For FULL details link to:- Pain   See Photos
10/2005 ANIMAL WELFARE BILL currently before Parliament - Important see http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/058/06058.1-7.html
After all the promising messages we have been receiving from DEFRA the "Government" ( NB ) has decided that dog tail docking should be left to choice and
Parliament should decide.  Tail
Docking fits the description precisely for the section of "Mutilations" in the Bill and yet this has been the outcome!   An
amendment is being considered for presentation to Parliament and it can only be hoped that MPs will be aware that if docking is exempted from the Bill
that the section relating to Mutilations could cause more, rather than less, animal suffering and possible legal uncertainties.  The Horse Docking and Nicking
Act of 1949 will be repealed under this Act but one guesses it will be subsumed under the Mutilation part of the Bill!
EXHIBITORS OF UNDOCKED SHOW DOGS AND THOSE USED IN THE FIELD.   Note this well.  On the Docked Breeds website under the NEED
FOR LOBBYING it says:-

"Meanwhile our ability to ensure that docked dogs continue to dominate in the shooting field, in the show ring and elsewhere has not been lost on those
who are against us".    They are damning themselves and the Kennel Club by their own words.   Also look at "Winning Friends" and "Taking on the
Veterinary Profession" where they want a return to lay docking and at how they arrive at their statistics!!
2005 - AUSTRALIA - because of the connection between cruelty to animals and the abuse of children all suspected cases of cruelty have to be reported .

17/5/05    Animal welfare toughened up Scotsman - Edinburgh,Scotland,UK... will retain a specific offence of causing unnecessary suffering,
and there will be a general prohibition on "mutilations", such as
tail - docking of dogs. ... See all stories on this topic

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/05/1683736/37494       to see the draft Bill

Independent 4/3/05 - http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/story.jsp?story=616688 The draft Bill was scrutinised by MPs on the House
of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee. The MPs recommended that electric-shock dog collars, designed to force
unruly canines into submission, be regulated. The docking of tails of
working dogs should also be banned, the
Committee said.
But the Government confirmed in its response to the report that it had refused both suggestions.
3/3/05 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs - Fourth Special Report http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmenvfru/385/38502.htm
Recommendations 82 and 83

82. We consider that tail docking in dogs should be banned for cosmetic reasons. Tail docking should continue to be permitted for therapeutic reasons,
where it is in an animal's best welfare interests. The question of allowing an exemption for prophylactic docking for certain breeds or types of working
dogs is more difficult. For example, there is a risk that a whole litter of puppies which might one day be used as working dogs could be docked as a
precautionary measure. Unless there is a system to guarantee that a docked puppy will be used as a working dog, an exemption for prophylactic docking
risks being abused. (Paragraph 340)
83. We therefore support Defra's proposed position on this issue. To prevent an abuse of any exemption for prophylactic docking, we recommend that a
puppy's tail should be permitted to be docked for prophylactic reasons only where the following conditions are met:
* as is currently required by law, tail docking should be carried out only by a veterinarian
* the veterinarian should take all reasonable steps to satisfy him or herself that the puppy is of a specified breed of dog, generally used as a working
dog, or that the puppy is likely to be used as a specified type of working dog
* the veterinarian should be required to maintain records demonstrating why he or she was satisfied that these conditions were met for example, a gun licence
* the veterinarian should be required to microchip any puppy which he or she docks; the microchip should contain the details of the veterinarian who
docked the puppy, and
* the veterinarian should provide the owner with a certificate endorsing the tail docking; the certificate should include the details of the veterinarian who
carried out the procedure. (Paragraph 341)
We will consider the feasibility of the recommendation concerning micro-chipping.
AUSTRALIA - 4/3/05 Liza Bacchiella of Forrest Beach, Queensland was fined $1000 for docking the tails of 5 Rottweiler puppies between May and June 2004.
A New South Wales man was jailed for 6 months for tail docking but the circumstances were more severe. Vet Dr. Anita Kocsis said docking was an unethical
and cruel practice of cutting the end of the puppy's spine with no anaesthetics; it is like having a finger chopped off. It is painful to the puppies as they become
distressed and whimper. http://townsvillebulletin.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,12447817%255E14787,00.html
NEW ZEALAND - 5/3/05 Waikato press report. Schnauzer breeder Rose Elle has imported undocked dogs from overseas and has docked tails of five month old
dogs that arrived in New Zealand . Vet Jodi Salinsky regularly sees botched home docking jobs.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/index.cfm?c_id=1&ObjectID=10113655
The Independent 16/2/05 - extract quote:- Dr. Michael Mendl of Bristol University said that there is an implicit assumption that the more clever an animal is, the
more likely it is to suffer, and he is not sure that there is a clear llink between the two. An accurate assessment of how animals feel, as well as how they think, is
vital to ensure a high standard of animal welfare. However, an animal that is not aware of its thoughts may still be aware of its feelings and emotions. An
awareness of sensations and emotions is known as "feelings consciousness". As far as welfare is concerned, this is the crux of the matter; what an animals
feels, not just what it thinks. Mendl says that animals like us that are clever are more likely to suffer because they can think about suffering in the future
and remember suffering in the past. But they are also capable of understanding that pain is going to stop. Less intelligent animals may not have this
capacity. They may therefore, be worse off because they suffer not knowing their pain can end.......
Procedures such as tail docking in sheep and branding in cattle are thought to be very painful because animals respond in a way we associate with pain.
Although feelings are highly subjective; even for those closest to us they are often private experiences. We have no idea what any animal really feels -
physiological studies show that when reacting as if in pain, animals' stress hormones soar. Prof. Dan Weary, from the University of British Columbia,
argues that conventional husbandry methods should be rethought on the basis of the animals' reactions. In one experiment, half the male piglets on
a farm were castrated and the other half were handled as if they were going to be. Only the pigs who were castrated made high-pitched squeals and
only at the time of castration. Some farmers believe that the younger the animal, the less painful the operation but these pigs squealed no matter
what age they were.
The experiment indicates that animals' calls are a good way of assessing their actual pain, rather than the expectation of
pain. .... Stress hormones in animals and humans can disrupt memory
; you could argue that the ability to process information and store memories
is related to conscious experience. On the other hand if pigs have no consciousness, forgetfulness can lead to damaging behaviour and inefficient
husbandry. For example, animals with impaired memories might attack individuals because they have forgotten they know them. This often happens
when sows that have given birth are reunited with their mates, they often fight vigorously.Prof. Anand is often referenced in pain related animal
studies such as tail docking. What follows can also be associated with animal behaviour:-

Sunday Times 27/2/05 - quote:-'A study of 200 preterm babies found they were subjected to a total of 20,000 procedures in the first 14 days of
life in intensive care. Add to this inappropriate stimulation and continuous bright light and you have a model for chronic stress. In most neonatal
units preterm babies lie on their backs on mats, naked apart from a nappy. Grossly immature reflexes mean that their arms and legs tend to wave
or flap which is distressing for the baby, whose every instinct is to curl and ball, seeking safe boundaries to contain him.
..... .....Twenty years ago
the notion of stress in preterm infants hadn't even been considered. Tbe pioneering work of of Al Aynsley-Green and Sunny Anand during the
1980s overturned the widely held belief that babies couldn't feel pain, or if they could, their experience if it somehow wasn't like ours
. Before this
time preterm babies regularly underwent surgery without anaesthesia. "Many of them died from shock" says Anand, now Professor of Paediatrics
and Anaesthesiology at Arkansas Children's Hospital. "Others were returned to the ward, grey and shut-down, and it would take nurses to stabilise
them. Their hormonal stress responses were five times what we expected. We proved that prolonged elevation of cortisol was incredibly damaging."
After 48 hours in intensive care, preterm babies have learnt what noxious stimuli are. When a foot is grabbed for a routine heel prick, they
desaturate (oxygen levels go down) and they become unstable, because they anticipate pain......A host of published studies shows that pain and
stress affect brain development and yet the message still isn't getting across..
.."The collective ego of the medical profession will have to face
the fact that their clinical approach is seriously limited" says Anand. "Do we have a choice? No we don't. It is our duty to practise what is best
for the baby."........Where scientists agree that the preterm brain is very plastic; it develops more between 23 ane 40 weeks' gestation than at
any other time throughout life, so sensory experience at this state is incredibly important....."Research has shown that a mother rocking her
baby in her arms has a therapeutic effect on pain management and growth but rocking a baby mechanically doesn't have the same effect. Why?
Because the baby however tiny craves a relationship", explains Anand

Otwin Linderkamp, Prof of Neonatology at the University of Heidleberg Medical School, "Very early on I noticed how tiny babies always tried to
get themselves into a corner in an incubator. The nurses took them back to the middle then the babies tried again. It was very sad this desperate
search for boundaries. When I first came to Heidelberg I found a typical intensive care unit babies lying on mats under bright lights, and because
they were agitated and moved around they were given sedation."
Sunny Anand claims to have the first objective proof that there is conscious processing of painful stimuli by even the most premature babies,
found by looking at responses within the cortex. His paper has been submitted to the New England Journal of Medicine. As the study contains
unpublished information, he is reluctant to reveal the results, but he says this is the definitive study that the developmental care lobby has been
waiting for. "We can now show that repeated painful stimuli produce an increase in the number of cells that die during brain development and
also alter a child's cognitive processing for life. I'm not saying pain is the only problem but we think it is responsible for the long term cognitive
outcomes.... "
1/3/05 CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON SCOTTISH ANIMAL WELFARE BILL - www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/environment/preawl-00.asp
ADA has been misquoted in section 1 where it states:-
Docking should only be permitted for therapeutic, prophylactic or preventative purposes. (West Lothian Council, RCVS, Anti-Docking Alliance,
Advocates for Animals, Animal Concern, individual).

ADA's submission did not say this and did not include docking for prophylactic or preventative purposes - what was actually stated in our
submission was as follows:
-
"Therapeutic" docking (for injury or illness) undertaken by a Veterinarian under anaesthesia, we consider to be the only docking which
should be legally permitted as a surgical treatment.

AUGUST 2004 -  This has just been emailed :- ‘Boxer dogs..Docked...THEY (the breeders) dock the tails ..not the vet. I know of
other breeders whose vet would not dock their puppies tails & have gone to this breeder for help.  Plus!  just 3
miles down the road there is a breeder of Standard Poodles.....docked.A few months earlier another  member
reported that at ringcraft, a Spinone breeder admitted to docking her litters.

Note this is illegal docking

Corporation of London Veterinary Service - 0207 332 3406. St Alphage House(13th floor), 2 Fore St
LONDON EC2Y 5DA has said they will prosecute any person who has docked a puppy (if it can be proved)
and inform the RCVS of any vet who has docked a puppy; ANY breed. The department deal with pet animal
health of behalf of a number of London boroughs. Outside theLondon boroughs it is up to the local authorities to enforce the Veterinary
Surgeons Act. Please inform them of breeders you know who are docking their litters. Some breeders are giving out misinformation saying that
they are permitted to do the docking themselves. THEY ARE NOT!
JULY 2004 PARSON RUSSELL BREEDER  said they would leave a tail on a puppy for someone but they would charge £600 for the undocked puppy which would
have to be paid for in advance
whereas a docked puppy would be £350 not paid for in advance! 
JULY 2004 PUPPY BREEDERS  - Essex County Council has invoked the Enterprise Act on a puppy trader at Bailey Kennels to bring her to court for contravening
section 14 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979.  Puppies sold  should be of satisfactory quality and fit for the purpose for which they were intended.  If she breaks the
enforcement order  she will be liable to a fine for contempt of court or even a jail sentence.  This came about as there were complaints  to the Council about sickly
and dying puppies being sold.  This seems to be the first time it has covered the produce of a breeder and not just a single puppy.    If anyone is buying a puppy
from a place where they appear to be puppy farming and the conditions are far from desirable this could be a way of getting it stopped.  First of all one complains
to the local Trading Standards Office  and quote the Enterprise Act.   More details on
http://www.dti.gpv.uk/ccp/topics1/enforcement.htm   Under Stop Now order
it will be seen that the Director of Fair Trading and other consumer bodies  can apply to the courts for “Stop Now” orders  to stop dealers from breaking laws that
harm the interests of consumers in general.  These order also enable consumer bodies to take on dealers for whom existing sanctions are no deterrent.
Posted 8/04   Quote from Peter Purves’ column in Our Dogs ‘…..What about the question of docking?  I must admit that I love to see some of the traditionally
docked breeds with their tails intact.  One doesn’t see many but when one does see an undocked Weimaraner or Cocker they do look to me, aesthetically correct. 
The balance looks good. Now I know that the majority of non-urban Vets will tell you that if you’ve ever seen a dog with its tail broken, spraying the surgery with
blood, then you would not question the rights or wrongs of docking and I am inclined to agree with any dog that is going to work on a regular basis…’This statement
begs all sorts of questions which lack answers.   What do the Vets think about dogs with broken legs spraying the surgery with blood – do they amputate or repair?  
Does this happen at every surgery, once a week/month/year etc.  Is it happening to Labradors, Retrievers,  Hounds, English Pointers etc.?
Posted 6/04  As we all know it is illegal for dogs to be docked except by Veterinary Surgeons.  Docked dogs are being shown at Kennel Club shows which have
been docked by their breeders.  As a result the  Kennel Club appear to be colluding  with  these law breaker breeders/exhibitors/ judges of these breeds.   Why are
they not demanding that all docked entries at shows should be accompanied by a copy Veterinary certificate to prove that the docking was lawfully (although
unethically) performed?   The Kennel Club surely should be leading by example.  They have started a much vaunted accredited breeders’ list but are they asking
these breeders of “docked” breeds who did the docking of litters so that they are acting in the confines of the law? Vets in parts of the country are apparently
asking clients who docked their puppies.  
23/11/04 QUEEN'S SPEECH - The Animal Welfare Bill was included in the Queen's Speech in the opening of Parliament today.
see:-http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4034739.stm
Posted 23/1/04  DEFRA  - Mr. Bradshaw newly appointed Minister dealing with proposed Animal Welfare Bill to be published April 2004.   Is quoted as
saying  that some breeds of working dogs will be exempt from any proposed ban on tail docking.  He says he is moving away from a total ban.  He apparently says
that as we allow human circumcision we should not be over draconian in terms of animal welfare. ..
Since this statement was made, it is  hoped  that his advisers will
remind him that circumcision is done, rightly or wrongly, for religious reasons or for therapeutic reasons and involves SKIN,  NOT the penis!  Dogs’  tails involve
not only skin and blood supply,  but nerves, muscle, tendon, bone and scent glands.   The argument for docking that  the pro-dockers give is to prevent possible
future injury and as only some breeds of working dogs have up to now been docked, there is no sound evidence that they would ALL  get tail injury if left
undocked (NB Retriever, Setter not docked).  Whilst in France recently, I met a hunter with an undocked Springer Spaniel (bought from Scottish breeder)  the
tail he said was never a problem and had never had an injury.  A greyhound is a working dog and in their racing life the statistics show that they will usually injure
one leg seriously but no-one advocates chopping off the likely offending  leg at birth.
USA - see this link http://www.avar.org/taildocking.html
2006 - TREVOR COOPER (DANGEROUS DOGS' ACT) - the Solicitor who has successfully defended many dogs under the Dangerous Dogs Act has now set up
a Helpline which covers England and Wales.  0906 515 1108 Mon-Thurs 7.30-9.30 pm.  Calls cost £1 50 pence per minute from BT landline others vary.  For other
information visit his website http://www.doglaw.co.uk
 Posted 12/03  PUPPY FARMING WALES AGAIN!!   Please EVERYONE  who visits this site act NOW on Welsh Puppy farming.  Mr. Robert Killick well known in the
dog  world is urging us all to write (especially those of you who live in Wales to your Assembly Member)  (or email) and
 ‘point out the illogical nature of  funding (taxpayers’
money) the production of more puppies when the NCDL/Dogs’ Trust has had to neuter 5,500 dogs already in 2003, have  removed 792 dogs to England for re-homing and has
spent over £400,000 of charity money this year on the problem of an excess number of dogs.  The Ty-Agored Sanctuary, Wales,  rarely has fewer than 100 dogs in their kennels’  
and have been turned down for grants and yet approval is being given  by the Welsh Assembly for grants for farmers to start up  puppy farms! Wales has double the number of
strays per head of population and this is rising. The Co-ordination of Animal Rescue charities have transferred 1800 dogs from Wales to England in the past 12 months.   Letters
please ASAP to Carwyn Jones, Agricultural Minister, Welsh Assembly, Food and Farming Development Division, Parc Cathays, Cardiff. CF10 3NQ Phone 029 2082 6977, ,
Cardiff or email
carwyn.jones@wales.gov.uk  but use the header Farming or similar ( do not use the word  Puppy Farming as your email may  get trashed!)   Keep it measured
and  polite even if  you cannot believe their crass stupidity in pursuing such schemes .   Christmas is a busy time for everyone but just think of the real act of goodwill you will
be participating in if you can stop the “Puppy Harming” .   The NCDL/Dogs’ Trust, Kennel Club and Robert Killick have all had unsuccessful attempts to stop these grants and
puppy farming.  Now it is up to us, the people,  the ELECTORS,  taxpayers and salary payers of these Ministers to tell them it has got to stop.   It also needs an immediate
Inquiry as to WHY “ they” are persisting with this when there is so much opposition……..  These unfortunate dogs/puppies may even end up in foreign countries where
they are eaten or stripped alive for their skins.
  Don’t we have enough  dogs in rescue that need re-homing without adding to the rescue problems?  These puppy farmers won’t
be taking their puppies back if sold to undesirable owners who then decide they no longer want them.  They won’t be checking who buys their puppies and their future welfare. 
It is unfair to animal charities and their donor supporters who have a continuing battle trying to contain the numbers of unwanted dogs.
 
THE BREEDING OF DOGS ACT  1973 came into force 1/1974.  This Act made it illegal for anyone to keep a  breeding establishment for dogs except  under the authority
provided by a licence.  The definition of a breeding kennel was defined as where more than two bitches were kept for the purpose of breeding for sale. The owner of an
unlicensed breeding kennel was liable to conviction and a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale.  This was increased to level 3 under the 1991 Act.  Selling a dog
with a false pedigree is a  criminal offence (obtaining money by false pretences).    Eg birth of puppies of a colour that could not be produced  by the  named parents or an
unusually high level of fertility among breeding bitches in a kennel could obtain a conviction.  .
If you know of anyone breeding in  abhorrent conditions please contact
your local Council with the facts, RSPCA.,  KC., and other agencies such as Inland Revenue,  Social Security and alert the press.
 

If you think you have found a puppy farm, get as much information as you such as name of owner, the address, tel numbers etc. If you see local adverts linked to them,
note how many breeds they offer.  Vans coming and going from the premises on a regular basis should have a note of their registration number and time of day seen.  All details
can be given to the Local Authority (keep copies), RSPCA and WAG= Ken McKie Tel 01357 529402 http://www.wag-ayrshire.org.uk/  The Local Authority will be able
to tell you if the establishment is licensed.  Ask them when the farm was last inspected and what were the finding and whether there have been previous complaints.  Push
you Local Authority as this is the only way action will be taken and make them more likely to enforce the law. If it has been your misfortune to have bought a puppy and the
puppy is ill or has died contact your local Trading Standards' Office. They should help you get your money back but there is one drawback if your puppy is still alive
and they give a refund you will have to give the puppy back .  Do not get involved with the puppy farmer directly as they may go to any lengths to protect their lucrative
business.  Don't remove pups or trespass as unfortunately the law will then regard you as the one contravening the law!

3/03 HOUSE OF LORDS BILL 3RD PARTY LIABILITY.